PyCharm - abonnement (1 an) - 1 développeur

What is our primary use case? I use PyCharm as my main IDE for Python coding. What is most valuable? The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines. I started using PyCharm while learning Python before VS Code existed, so I've stuck with it. I don't integrate it with other tools. I use random online tools to test connections for database work, then do everything else in PyCharm. What needs improvement? Customizing the tool can make it complicated. For how long have I used the solution? I have been working with the product for more than five years. How are customer service and support? I've never needed to contact technical support as it always works fine. How was the initial setup? Setting up PyCharm is easy - just clicking "next" a few times. You can customize it deeply if you want, but that can get complicated. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there. What other advice do I have? I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

What is our primary use case? I use the solution to run, test, and debug codes. What is most valuable? We have integrated the tool with GitHub. PyCharm provides easy integration with GitHub, allowing us to push changes directly. Many plugins are available on PyCharm for GitHub integration, including GitHub Copilot for auto code completion and GitHub Copilot Chat for assistance with code-related queries. The solution has significantly improved my coding efficiency with its feature that shows documentation when I hover over code. This feature, which was recently introduced, is especially useful when using an inbuilt function from a Python package because it gives me immediate access to documentation and references, helping me understand how to use the function properly. What needs improvement? The solution is heavy because running it on laptops consumes a lot of memory and power. Typically, a laptop battery might last about eight to nine hours, but with the tool running, it reduces to two hours or one and a half hours at most. It is designed to handle large projects and heavy tasks, making it resource-intensive. For smaller projects, use IDEs like Visual Studio Code. What do I think about the stability of the solution? There are many versions of PyCharm, and I prefer using the stable version for all my production-level development. For testing purposes, I might upgrade to the latest version. Bugs are usually resolved quickly, so it's not a big deal to encounter one since there's often an immediate fix available. How are customer service and support? I contacted JetBrains support to verify my student certificate three years ago. After three years, they deactivated it, and I had to email their support team to reactivate my account. They responded quickly and reactivated it for me. How was the initial setup? I downloaded the application from the JetBrains website, installed the .exe file, and then logged in with my GitHub account to save and sync all my settings. This includes team preferences and other user and system settings, making the onboarding process simple and easy. What other advice do I have? If you're interested in using PyCharm, I'd advise you to watch a video tutorial to learn how to fully take advantage of its features. I recently discovered many useful features I wish I had known about earlier, which could have enhanced my productivity. JetBrains also sends newsletters with updates, which can be helpful. While it can be time-consuming to explore all the features, it's often worth it because some features are incredibly useful. I'd rate PyCharm an eight out of ten. Two points are deducted because it's quite heavy on system resources, which can be a drawback for regular use. Second, many useful features are hidden, requiring users to be curious to explore them. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

What is our primary use case? I switch between using Visual Studio and PyCharm depending on the task at hand. In Visual Studio, I work on Q, while in PyCharm, I handle Python-related tasks. What is most valuable? In PyCharm, the process of creating folders in Python is straightforward and efficient. It offers a smart assistant feature that highlights errors and provides easy fixes. The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone. PyCharm supports remote development and has debugging functions that allow me to track the flow of code and pinpoint errors accurately. The code analysis capabilities in PyCharm are beneficial for structuring code and identifying areas that need improvement or debugging and PyCharm enhances my coding efficiency and helps me effectively manage and analyze my code. What needs improvement? I think there are a few areas where PyCharm could improve. Firstly, the pricing for the professional edition can be quite high, especially for users who need access to advanced features. Next, the user interface and overall user experience could be more intuitive to make it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively. Another aspect is PyCharm is specialized for Python development, it would be beneficial if it could support a wider range of languages to cater to diverse programming needs. PyCharm could optimize its disk space usage in the next version, perhaps by introducing a lighter version or implementing features that reduce the storage footprint. This would be especially helpful for users dealing with a significant amount of code and projects. For how long have I used the solution? I have experience with PyCharm. What do I think about the stability of the solution? In terms of stability, I would rate PyCharm at six, as there have been instances of it breaking or getting stuck. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? My rating for PyCharm's scalability would be around seven, considering the advanced features related to purchase. How are customer service and support? Regarding technical support, we haven't contacted them yet as we are using the free version. When comparing PyCharm to other products like Visual Studio or Jupyter Notebook, those are preferred for certain tasks. How was the initial setup? The initial setup for PyCharm was straightforward and easy. I'm currently using the desktop version, not the paid version. What about the implementation team? Integrating PyCharm with other products from different vendors is also easy and doesn't take much time. The IDE works well, whether it's PyCharm or Visual Studio's IDE, and handling porting issues is also simple. What other advice do I have? I would rate PyCharm at seven, and I would recommend it to beginners or those starting with Python programming for its ease of use. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

How has it helped my organization? It's very easy to use. First of all, I have a professional account, not a community, free account. It's very good for high-level use, as well as for those who are just starting out. It makes it easy for developers to access databases. What is most valuable? Good syntax highlighting and it's very customizable. What needs improvement? The navigation can be better. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using PyCharm for two years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is highly stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? It is a scalable solution. Presently, fifteen people are using the solution. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is straightforward. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The price is reasonable. What other advice do I have? Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Public Cloud Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

What is our primary use case? I use it for software development. I use it for Python development. I use it for a variety of things. I've worked with Jango, Flask, and even AWS deployments. It's pretty versatile when it comes to frameworks. What is most valuable? It's just a great all-around IDE with good language support, solid integration with source control, and helpful features like virtual environment and requirements management. It even tells you if your code is compatible with different Python versions, which is awesome. Plus, their recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool, even if it's not perfect. We use the debugger in the lab, but not really for advanced analysis. We do the basic stuff in PyCharm, but nothing fancy. But the debugger itself is very good. So, PyCharm's debugging is helpful for our development process. What needs improvement? There is room for improvement in memory usage. It uses too much memory. It can get a bit heavy, especially when you have too many open files and the system becomes very slow. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using it for eight years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? It's very stable. No problems there. I've used Docker with PyCharm. It has some pretty cool features like building and debugging inside containers, which I haven't used much yet but seem promising. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Scalability is really relevant here. It's a developer tool, and everyone on the team has their own copy. It's not like a scaling tool. I use it with version control, and it works great. It actually makes things much easier. There are around ten users using PyCharm in my company. How are customer service and support? I've contacted customer service and support, and they were pretty helpful. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? For Python development, I always use PyCharm. Visual Studio works better for Windows development, especially anything .NET. Visual Studio is amazing for C++. Generally, PyCharm is better for Python, and Visual Studio might be better for other languages, but it's more expensive. How was the initial setup? Setup is easy, but I haven't used the cloud deployment option. I only use it on-premises. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The community edition is free, which is good. There's a free version available. As for the commercial license that I use, the pricing is fair. What other advice do I have? It's a good product. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

What is our primary use case? We use the product primarily for data processing. What is most valuable? The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly. What needs improvement? They should improve the product's interactiveness. There could be a specific feature for it similar to Visual Studio Code. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using PyCharm for five years now. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Stability-wise, there are no issues. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We used VS Code before. In comparison, PyCharm has good IDE features. How was the initial setup? The initial setup may take some time to complete if you don't have prior experience working with the product. Otherwise, the process is simple. What other advice do I have? I rate PyCharm a nine out of ten. Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:partner

What is our primary use case? We are using PyCharm as our IDE and user interface for Python code development. Along with PyCharm, we also use other software including Coverity and Pylint, and some of my colleagues are also using QAC. What is most valuable? The best feature of PyCharm is that it gives you hints whenever it detects any issues while you are coding. This is important because it helps us code faster and without any errors. What needs improvement? PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system. Another way they could improve PyCharm is if they made it possible to connect directly with various workflow products such as GitLab or Git. Direct connection integrations with these products would add a lot of value. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using PyCharm for three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Although it can be heavy on resources, I would rate the stability of PyCharm a seven out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? My team has around 15 members who use PyCharm daily. How are customer service and support? Until now, I haven't had any interaction with PyCharm support. How was the initial setup? The setup process is easy. I would rate it a nine out of ten. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive. What other advice do I have? The main difference between PyCharm and competitor products lies in their features. PyCharm's features are specifically designed for Python programming, while its competitor products are typically more generic since they are designed for multiple languages. Rafael: I would rate PyCharm an eight out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

What is our primary use case? Our company uses the solution for software projects with robotic operating systems. Software that we build is very complex in usage. What is most valuable? The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software. A good repository of packages can be installed easily and used quickly. It is easy to integrate and work on the virtual environment for development. The solution is very intuitive, so it is simple to figure out as you go. The solution supports robotics-related software tools. Not many IDEs offer that support. What needs improvement? The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package. Open CV is used to develop software that involves computer vision tasks. It seems the solution is not fully updated to use the latest PyCharm packages. I would like even more support toward robotics-related software tools. For example, support of ROS, ROS 1, and ROS 2 development would ensure that I continue to use the solution. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using the solution for three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is stable so I rate it a ten out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable with no performance issues for large projects. How are customer service and support? I reached out to support for one project where I had issues with configurations and setting up the environment, but I did not hear back. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? When I was a student, I used the solution's free community edition that included many professional development and software tools. How was the initial setup? The setup is very easy. If you watch a video tutorial, then you can be up an running in five minutes. What about the implementation team? I implemented the solution in-house. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee. Many add-ons or packages are available. What other advice do I have? The solution has a good reputation in the development community because it is very easy to use for creating software. College students who want to build quickly should use the solution. Many tutorials and online resources are available for ongoing learning. I rate the solution a ten out of ten because it has always been very convenient to use, is easy to understand, and surely increases the effectiveness of software development. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.