Cisco Meraki Cloud Managed MS225-24P - commutateur - 24 ports - Géré - Montable sur rack

7 421,94 $

Économisez 3051.95 $

4 369,99 $

Mfg # MS225-24P-HW CDW # 4402130

Cisco Meraki Cloud Managed MS225-24P - commutateur - 24 ports - Géré - Montable sur rack

Caractéristiques techniques en un clin d’œil

24P
Géré
rack-mountable, desktop

Commutateur
24 x 10/100/1000 (PoE+) + 4 x SFP+
PoE+ (370 W)

Voir tout

Connaître son équipement

La gamme de switchs d'accès cloud Meraki MS offre aux réseaux de filiales et de campus les avantages du cloud computing, parmi lesquels la simplicité de gestion, une complexité réduite et un coût moindre.

Les switchs de Meraki sont conçus dès l'origine pour une gestion simple sans sacrifier la puissance et la flexibilité que présentent en général les switchs pour l'entreprise. Ainsi, la gestion des switchs de Meraki s'effectue par le biais d'une interface cloud élégante et efficace, plutôt que par une ligne de commande cryptique.

La mise en place d'un switch Meraki se fait par simple branchement, sans besoin de fichiers de configuration complexes. De plus, le système de gestion centralisé de Meraki dote les administrateurs d'une vue détaillée du réseau. Ils peuvent visualiser quels switchs, sur des centaines, approchent leurs limites de capacité, trouver toutes les modifications de configuration effectuée par une personne donnée en un instant. Ils sont également en mesure de localiser un switch en un clic sur un plan d'ensemble.

7 421,94 $

Économisez 3051.95 $

4 369,99 $

Prix annoncé

Reviews

(92)

Disponibilité : Commande de l’article en attente

Vérifier la disponibilité en stock

Ajouter pour comparer

Save to Favorites

Enhance your purchase

Accessories

Marques

Top Selling Meraki Products

MR Series Enterprise de Cisco Meraki – licence d'abonnement (3 ans) – 1 accès

(194)

$344.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Z1 Enterprise - licence d'abonnement (3 ans) - 1 licence

(194)

$102.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Enterprise - licence d'abonnement - 1 switch

(194)

$153.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Enterprise - licence d'abonnement - 1 switch

(194)

$53.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Advanced Security - licence d'abonnement - 1 licence

(194)

$558.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Enterprise - licence d'abonnement (3 ans) - 1 licence

(194)

$594.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Advanced Security - licence d'abonnement - 1 licence

(194)

$1,088.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Advanced Security - subscription license (3 years) + 3 Years S

(194)

$1,178.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Enterprise - subscription license (1 year) + 1 Year Enterprise

(194)

$279.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Enterprise - subscription license (3 years) + 3 Years Enterpri

(194)

$585.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Enterprise - subscription license (3 years) + 3 Years Enterpri

(194)

$221.99

Prix annoncé
Cisco Meraki Enterprise - subscription license (3 years) + 3 Years Enterpri

(194)

$403.99

Prix annoncé

Compare to similar models

Availability
Rating
Form Factor (Hubs & Switches)
Administrable
Ports
Type de produit
Switching Type

Current Item

Encre et toner

$7,421.94
Save $3051.95

$4,369.99

Prix annoncé
Article en attente
(94)
Desktop,Rack-mountable
Oui
24
Commutateur
Gigabit Ethernet

Encre et toner

$188.99

Prix annoncé
Disponible
Not Yet Rated
Wall-mountable,Desktop
Oui
8
Commutateur
Gigabit Ethernet

Encre et toner

$442.99

Prix annoncé
Disponible
Not Yet Rated
—
—
—
—
—

Encre et toner

$480.00
Save $135.01

$344.99

Prix annoncé
Disponible
Not Yet Rated
Desktop,Wall-mountable,Rack-mountable
Non
16
Commutateur
Gigabit Ethernet

Accessories

CDW recommande (4) total accessories
Réseautage et serveurs (3) total accessories
Bâtis et logements (1) total accessories

Disponible

Cisco Meraki Enterprise - subscription license (1 year) + 1 Year Enterprise

(194)customer reviews

Subscription license (1 year) + 1 Year Enterprise Support
1 switch
Pour P/N : MS225-24P-HW

Lowest Price

297,99 $

Prix annoncé

Disponible

Cisco Meraki Enterprise - subscription license (3 years) + 3 Years Enterpri

(194)customer reviews

Subscription license (3 years) + 3 Years Enterprise Support
1 switch
Pour P/N : MS225-24P-HW

Lowest Price

668,99 $

Prix annoncé

Disponible

Cisco Meraki Enterprise - subscription license (5 years) + 5 Years Enterpri

(194)customer reviews

Subscription license (5 years) + 5 Years Enterprise Support
1 switch
Pour P/N : MS225-24P-HW

Lowest Price

1 106,99 $

Prix annoncé

Reviews

4.5/5

92 Total

Reviews by Ratings

5 Stars 53%

4 Stars 40%

3 Stars 4%

2 Stars 2%

1 Stars 0%

1-8 of 92 reviews

Clear All Filters

By reviewer2534667 - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Manages networks seamlessly with robust connectivity and minimal issues

What is our primary use case? We use Meraki MS Switches for larger companies, as part of our organization, where they are connected to the servers here via VPN. They are used daily. What is most valuable? The stability and workflow of Meraki MS Switches have most improved our network management. I also appreciate the high availability offered by the solution. I use it because the environment is working fine with no major problems and it's easy to manage. What needs improvement? Meraki MS Switches is a complete solution. I don't have specific feedback for improvement. However, there was an issue with the uplink when the port was removed and had to be reinstalled, which caused a temporary dropout. For how long have I used the solution? For three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I find Meraki MS Switches to be stable, with no significant issues reported. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. How are customer service and support? I don't have much experience interacting with Cisco technical support. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? Before Meraki switches, we used a mixed solution of Cisco switches. There were no problems with these solutions, but they wanted a more unified approach. How was the initial setup? The initial setup was conducted by a third party. I'm not directly involved in the setup process. What about the implementation team? A certified third-party team handled the implementation of the solution. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? Meraki MS Switches, including their licensing, are somewhat expensive, particularly when compared with competitor solutions like HP. What other advice do I have? I recommend Meraki MS Switches for larger companies rather than small businesses. Small businesses might benefit more from other solutions. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? We use Meraki MS Switches for larger companies, as part of our organization, where they are connected to the servers here via VPN. They are used daily. What is most valuable? The stability and workflow of Meraki MS Switches have most improved our network management. I also appre Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By MajidKhan - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Remote access enhances troubleshooting with potential for more intuitive interface

What is our primary use case? We are working with Citrix and router, but in Cisco for Cisco vendor only. We are taking from them since 2015. The main use case involves some small business customers needing one router, one switch, and two to three access points. It is easy to handle the devices with just a small knowledge of switches. How has it helped my organization? Meraki MS Switches have allowed us to access devices from anywhere in the world through the cloud. This eliminates the need to be physically present, as I can troubleshoot and work on devices remotely. What is most valuable? The most valuable feature is the ability to access devices from anywhere in the world through the cloud. What needs improvement? It would be helpful to have more features like an iOS interface. Most people are familiar with the Cisco commands, and it would be beneficial if the switch could be accessed by GUI configuration and by normally accessing the console. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using the solution since 2015, and we began taking from Cisco in 2016. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The devices are reliable, and there is no indication of issues so far. If something happens to the device or hardware, Cisco will automatically change the device by the next business day. How are customer service and support? Customer service and support are effective. If the devices are licensed, the support team will assist you depending on the severity level of the case. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? Pricing is affordable, and licenses for the cloud need to be purchased every three to five years. What other advice do I have? We are recommending all of the features available in Meraki MS Switches. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:partner What is our primary use case? We are working with Citrix and router, but in Cisco for Cisco vendor only. We are taking from them since 2015. The main use case involves some small business customers needing one router, one switch, and two to three access points. It is easy to handle the devices with just a sma Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Ravi Ramachandran - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Cloud management enhances remote manageability but more PoE and stacking options needed

What is our primary use case? I am a system integrator and my company is a partner for Cisco. How has it helped my organization? The ease of use and manageability from anywhere, whether it is from your mobile app or anywhere else with an Internet connection, is a unique selling point. It helps reduce network Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By JulienMillet - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Precise traffic analytics and global management elevate remote network control

What is our primary use case? We use Meraki MS Switches for VLANs, remote configuration, and having a single interface for configuring all our sites. Additionally, we rely on 100% remote configuration. How has it helped my organization? Meraki MS Switches provide a single global management interface in the cloud, allowing us to access any switch configuration from a single interface. What is most valuable? One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time. What needs improvement? There are compatibility issues with certain Power over Ethernet (PoE) devices, which we would like to see resolved. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using the solution for three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is stable, but there is always room for improvement. We faced issues following firmware updates, which we now handle by performing updates outside of working hours. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? On a scale from one to ten, I would rate scalability as eight out of ten. How are customer service and support? Cisco's tech support is pretty good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We did evaluate other options. We chose Meraki switches because it provided the ability to manage remote switches effectively, offering good control over all our equipment remotely. How was the initial setup? The setup process was pretty straightforward, and I would rate it an eight out of ten for ease. What was our ROI? It's difficult to calculate return on investment. The primary advantage is the centralized and online access to switch configurations. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The solution is a bit expensive as it is on the high end. The cost depends on the model and the number of years of usage. Which other solutions did I evaluate? We evaluated other options but Meraki was the only solution that offered good remote switch management. What other advice do I have? I would recommend using Meraki MS Switches as it is good equipment, sturdy, and works well. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? We use Meraki MS Switches for VLANs, remote configuration, and having a single interface for configuring all our sites. Additionally, we rely on 100% remote configuration. How has it helped my organization? Meraki MS Switches provide a single global management interface in the c Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By reviewer2287467 - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Reliable firewalling solution that's easy to install and configure

What is our primary use case? We used Meraki Switches primarily for firewalling. How has it helped my organization? They help us provide reliable solutions to other customers as system integrators. What is most valuable? The reliability and ease of configuration are good. I very seldom receive complaints about the switches. What needs improvement? The GUI can be improved for a better comfort level. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using Meraki Switches for more than seven or eight years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The product has always catered to the specifications, and we haven't had any complaints about it. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Scalability is not a problem. We have it on-premises, and it is easy to scale. How are customer service and support? Sometimes, we don't get support. That depends on the product warranty and support conditions. As a system integrator, I rate it a six out of ten as I can't raise any tickets without procuring equipment in my name. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We have worked with Sophos. How was the initial setup? It is easy to install and usually requires just one technician. What about the implementation team? One technician is usually enough for the installation. We manage the implementation ourselves as system integrators. What was our ROI? As a system integrator, we don't have that parameter for our markings. Return on investment is not applicable to us. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? Compared to other products in the market, it is always expensive. Which other solutions did I evaluate? I am not sure about other solutions besides Meraki and Sophos. What other advice do I have? I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? On-premises Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:Integrator What is our primary use case? We used Meraki Switches primarily for firewalling. How has it helped my organization? They help us provide reliable solutions to other customers as system integrators. What is most valuable? The reliability and ease of configuration are good. I very seldom receive complaints a Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By HirenPatel2 - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Simplified our management process and has the ability to manage all of the logs from the dashboard

What is our primary use case? We have multiple sites across India with over thirty-five test plants in our network. The device management tools and logs are very user-friendly, making it easy to manage our network. It has simplified our management process. What is most valuable? With the license, you can manage and track all logs from the dashboard, making monitoring very easy. What needs improvement? We prefer Meeraki to be installed only on a local network rather than in a cloud-managed network. Meraki MS Switches are one of our largest categories, with over thirty-five deployed. However, the switches sometimes go offline, preventing us from effectively managing our networks. This issue arises because Meraki switches rely heavily on cloud connectivity. Given our need for reliable local network management, it would be beneficial if Meraki could launch an on-premises software solution. This would make it easier to manage the local network independently of cloud connectivity, especially when the cloud connection is down. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Meraki MS Switches for three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Meraki is very stable, with approximately 95-98% uptime. There are some occasional port fluctuations. Sometimes, simply replugging or transferring the connection to another port resolves the issue. There have been instances where a restart was necessary. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? We are managing over 35 devices. The solution is scalable. How are customer service and support? The technical support requires improvement. We have observed network loops at several sites, which we manage remotely. We sought technical support during these incidents, but communication was very challenging. Therefore, from a support standpoint, improvements are necessary. Having local support personnel who can better manage such situations would be beneficial. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? When comparing Meraki MS Switches with our current Catalyst switches, we find that using Catalyst switches managed through a controller is highly beneficial. Installing the controller to manage all switches is straightforward and ensures efficient management. The Catalyst switches are known for their stability and longevity, with many features still operational five to six years after installation. Regarding stability, Catalyst switches offer 99% reliability, compared to 92-98 percent for Meraki switches. Additionally, Catalyst switches have proven to be more robust against resource and performance fluctuations than Meraki. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is easy. It typically takes two to three hours, and we have a single engineer for it. What was our ROI? Meraki MS Switches are highly beneficial. They significantly reduce troubleshooting time and enhance network stability. Features such as automatic loop negotiation and intuitive configuration options have saved our engineers considerable time. One engineer can manage over 35 users. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The licensing for Meraki MS Switches is good and reasonably priced. While the cost is slightly higher, approximately 5 to 10 percent more than some competitors due to market conditions, it remains an excellent value given the benefits. This slight premium is justified by the comprehensive features and support plans offered. What other advice do I have? The security features of Meraki MS Switches are excellent. They include advanced capabilities such as built-in security measures and the ability to manage all features through the Meraki cloud dashboard, making configuration straightforward. Key features include port blocking and traffic management, allowing detailed control over network traffic. Additionally, Meraki MS Switches offer built-in firewall functionalities within the dashboard, enhancing the overall security level. I highly recommend the Meraki MS switches to manage multiple local call center locations. Meraki is an excellent solution because of its enabled dashboard and the ability to manage it with a license from anywhere. However, one drawback is that it can only be managed with Ethernet. This limitation is quite specific to these switches. Otherwise, Meraki is a reliable solution for managing other remote setups. We are considering Meraki MS Switches, their capabilities, and how they align with our expansion plans. We may need features like CI integration or related functionalities. Understanding the AI tools available with Meraki and identifying those applicable to our site requirements is crucial. First, we must comprehend the tools' capabilities and where they can be effectively deployed. These are key considerations that require clarity from Cisco. Overall, I rate the solution an eight-point five out of ten. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? We have multiple sites across India with over thirty-five test plants in our network. The device management tools and logs are very user-friendly, making it easy to manage our network. It has simplified our management process. What is most valuable? With the license, you can ma Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Roger Dibbens - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Efficient, easy to run, convenient, and provides more visibility

What is our primary use case? I am using MX400, MS320, MX250, and MS250. We also used MX64 before. We have replaced it with MX67. What is most valuable? The solution is efficient and easy to run. What needs improvement? The product has no CLI. The solution must provide a command line interface like the one Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Lakshmanan A - Systèmes d’exploitation réseau

Graphical user interface (GUI) is the best part and offers compatibility with various firewalls and filtering capabilities

What is our primary use case? We connect all workstations, CCTV, and biometric devices. We're using VLANs in Meraki, which is very easy for us. We can access it from anywhere since we are using Meraki in the cloud. How has it helped my organization? Meraki MS switches support the network management tasks. It is connected to our Cisco Nexus core switch. The connection goes from the server to the Nexus, then to Meraki, and then to the end-users. What is most valuable? Changing VLANs is much easier in Meraki compared to other switches using the GUI. The GUI is the best part of Meraki. It's very easy to access. Meraki does support CLI, but the GUI is purely GUI, which is very easy to access. The security features, compatibility with other firewalls, and filtering capabilities in the MS switches have been the most beneficial for our network. What needs improvement? Tracking native ports with IP addresses is not currently possible in Meraki. I can track by hostname, but not IP address. I have requested this feature from Cisco, and they are working on it. So, this is an area of improvement. I would like to be able to use it on the local network. Currently, if there is no internet, I cannot use Meraki because it only works through the online portal. I would like to access the switches locally, even if the internet is down. Thie needs to be changed. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using it for two years. I work with the current update. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. There are no challenges with the stability. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? We can extend the switches to the server room. We currently have four to six switches. If we want to add more switches, we can stack them onto existing ones, effectively combining them into a single switch. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. Currently, we have 192 endpoints (48 X 4 ports) connected to our four switches, but we have 240 users. We will replicate the four more switches. We have already planned and procured four more switches, which need to be implemented. We are in the process of increasing usage. How are customer service and support? The technical support needs to be improved. When we had some issues, they asked for the tag. Since Meraki is new to them, there aren't many experienced Cisco engineers who handle Meraki. There is room for improvement here. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? I used Aruba. My company decided to switch to Meraki. Otherwise, I didn't had any issue Aruba. It was a corporate decision. How was the initial setup? I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being easy to setup. Deployment time: Everything was smooth. The deployment model is on the cloud. It is Meraki dashboard. Its own portal. Deployment process: It took just half an hour to deploy. We connect to the network and obtain an IP. The switch is added into the portal using the license. Once that's done, we can access the switch in the portal and configure everything there. What about the implementation team? It is self-deployed. No maintenance is requried for Meraki MS switches. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The pricing is very expensive. I would rate it a ten out of ten, with ten being expensive. The total cost for the switches, including future usage, is around 35 lakhs. What other advice do I have? Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend other users who have a good internet connection who are considering implementing Meraki MS Switches. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Public Cloud Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.customer What is our primary use case? We connect all workstations, CCTV, and biometric devices. We're using VLANs in Meraki, which is very easy for us. We can access it from anywhere since we are using Meraki in the cloud. How has it helped my organization? Meraki MS switches support the network management tasks. It Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

Show 8 more reviews